[DRBD-user] Re: New drbd .spec file for 0.6.10+

Sean Reifschneider jafo at tummy.com
Sun Feb 29 08:10:59 CET 2004

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 10:12:33AM +0100, Philipp Reisner wrote:
>Could you please confirm that, current CVS head has the .spec file
>as it shoulde be ?

It looks like the version in CVS doesn't allow installing both the SMP
and non-SMP version.  It also uses "km" instead of "kernel-module" for
the prefix, and doesn't include the "drbd" name in the package name.
Interesting choices for the name.  I don't think I've ever seen that
convention used before.  I'd probably recommend at least putting "drbd"
in the package name -- it's not like drbd is the only third-party module
available.  ;-)

 "You can tune a file-system, but you can't tune a fish."
                 --  Quote from tunefs(1M) man page
Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff <jafo at tummy.com>
tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995.  Qmail, Python, SysAdmin

More information about the drbd-user mailing list