[Drbd-dev] [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr
Xiaomeng Tong
xiam0nd.tong at gmail.com
Thu Mar 3 03:27:29 CET 2022
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:04:06 +0000, David Laight
<David.Laight at ACULAB.COM> wrote:
> I think that it would be better to make any alternate loop macro
> just set the variable to NULL on the loop exit.
> That is easier to code for and the compiler might be persuaded to
> not redo the test.
No, that would lead to a NULL dereference.
The problem is the mis-use of iterator outside the loop on exit, and
the iterator will be the HEAD's container_of pointer which pointers
to a type-confused struct. Sidenote: The *mis-use* here refers to
mistakely access to other members of the struct, instead of the
list_head member which acutally is the valid HEAD.
IOW, you would dereference a (NULL + offset_of_member) address here.
Please remind me if i missed something, thanks.
> OTOH there may be alternative definitions that can be used to get
> the compiler (or other compiler-like tools) to detect broken code.
> Even if the definition can't possibly generate a working kerrnel.
The "list_for_each_entry_inside(pos, type, head, member)" way makes
the iterator invisiable outside the loop, and would be catched by
compiler if use-after-loop things happened.
Can you share your "alternative definitions" details? thanks!
--
Xiaomeng Tong
More information about the drbd-dev
mailing list