[Drbd-dev] [RFC for-6.2/block V2] block: Change the granularity of io ticks from ms to ns

Jens Axboe axboe at kernel.dk
Thu Dec 8 00:08:33 CET 2022


On 12/7/22 3:32?PM, Gulam Mohamed wrote:
> As per the review comment from Jens Axboe, I am re-sending this patch
> against "for-6.2/block".
> 
> 
> Use ktime to change the granularity of IO accounting in block layer from
> milli-seconds to nano-seconds to get the proper latency values for the
> devices whose latency is in micro-seconds. After changing the granularity
> to nano-seconds the iostat command, which was showing incorrect values for
> %util, is now showing correct values.
> 
> We did not work on the patch to drop the logic for
> STAT_PRECISE_TIMESTAMPS yet. Will do it if this patch is ok.
> 
> The iostat command was run after starting the fio with following command
> on an NVME disk. For the same fio command, the iostat %util was showing
> ~100% for the disks whose latencies are in the range of microseconds.
> With the kernel changes (granularity to nano-seconds), the %util was
> showing correct values. Following are the details of the test and their
> output:

My default peak testing runs at 122M IOPS. That's also the peak IOPS of
the devices combined, and with iostats disabled. If I enabled iostats,
then the performance drops to 112M IOPS. It's no longer device limited,
that's a drop of about 8.2%.

Adding this patch, and with iostats enabled, performance is at 91M IOPS.
That's a ~25% drop from no iostats, and a ~19% drop from the iostats we
have now...

Here's what I'd like to see changed:

- Split the patch up. First change all the types from unsigned long to
  u64, that can be done while retaining jiffies.

- Add an iostats == 2 setting, which enables this higher resolution
  mode. We'd still default to 1, lower granularity iostats enabled.

I think that's cleaner than one big patch, and means that patch 1 should
not really have any noticeable changes. That's generally how I like to
get things split. With that, then I think there could be a way to get
this included.

-- 
Jens Axboe



More information about the drbd-dev mailing list