[Drbd-dev] [PATCH 06/27] drbd: cleanup decide_on_discard_support
Christoph Böhmwalder
christoph.boehmwalder at linbit.com
Wed Apr 6 11:28:36 CEST 2022
Am 06.04.22 um 08:04 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> Sanitize the calling conventions and use a goto label to cleanup the
> code flow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
> index 02030c9c4d3b1..40bb0b356a6d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
> @@ -1204,38 +1204,42 @@ static unsigned int drbd_max_discard_sectors(struct drbd_connection *connection)
> }
>
> static void decide_on_discard_support(struct drbd_device *device,
> - struct request_queue *q,
> - struct request_queue *b,
> - bool discard_zeroes_if_aligned)
> + struct drbd_backing_dev *bdev)
> {
> - /* q = drbd device queue (device->rq_queue)
> - * b = backing device queue (device->ldev->backing_bdev->bd_disk->queue),
> - * or NULL if diskless
> - */
> - struct drbd_connection *connection = first_peer_device(device)->connection;
> - bool can_do = b ? blk_queue_discard(b) : true;
> -
> - if (can_do && connection->cstate >= C_CONNECTED && !(connection->agreed_features & DRBD_FF_TRIM)) {
> - can_do = false;
> - drbd_info(connection, "peer DRBD too old, does not support TRIM: disabling discards\n");
> - }
> - if (can_do) {
> - /* We don't care for the granularity, really.
> - * Stacking limits below should fix it for the local
> - * device. Whether or not it is a suitable granularity
> - * on the remote device is not our problem, really. If
> - * you care, you need to use devices with similar
> - * topology on all peers. */
> - blk_queue_discard_granularity(q, 512);
> - q->limits.max_discard_sectors = drbd_max_discard_sectors(connection);
> - blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
> - q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors = drbd_max_discard_sectors(connection);
> - } else {
> - blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
> - blk_queue_discard_granularity(q, 0);
> - q->limits.max_discard_sectors = 0;
> - q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors = 0;
> + struct drbd_connection *connection =
> + first_peer_device(device)->connection;
> + struct request_queue *q = device->rq_queue;
> +
> + if (bdev && !blk_queue_discard(bdev->backing_bdev->bd_disk->queue))
> + goto not_supported;
> +
> + if (connection->cstate >= C_CONNECTED &&
> + !(connection->agreed_features & DRBD_FF_TRIM)) {
> + drbd_info(connection,
> + "peer DRBD too old, does not support TRIM: disabling discards\n");
> + goto not_supported;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * We don't care for the granularity, really.
> + *
> + * Stacking limits below should fix it for the local device. Whether or
> + * not it is a suitable granularity on the remote device is not our
> + * problem, really. If you care, you need to use devices with similar
> + * topology on all peers.
> + */
> + blk_queue_discard_granularity(q, 512);
> + q->limits.max_discard_sectors = drbd_max_discard_sectors(connection);
> + blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
> + q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors =
> + drbd_max_discard_sectors(connection);
> + return;
> +
> +not_supported:
> + blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
> + blk_queue_discard_granularity(q, 0);
> + q->limits.max_discard_sectors = 0;
> + q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors = 0;
> }
>
> static void fixup_discard_if_not_supported(struct request_queue *q)
> @@ -1273,7 +1277,6 @@ static void drbd_setup_queue_param(struct drbd_device *device, struct drbd_backi
> unsigned int max_segments = 0;
> struct request_queue *b = NULL;
> struct disk_conf *dc;
> - bool discard_zeroes_if_aligned = true;
>
> if (bdev) {
> b = bdev->backing_bdev->bd_disk->queue;
> @@ -1282,7 +1285,6 @@ static void drbd_setup_queue_param(struct drbd_device *device, struct drbd_backi
> rcu_read_lock();
> dc = rcu_dereference(device->ldev->disk_conf);
> max_segments = dc->max_bio_bvecs;
> - discard_zeroes_if_aligned = dc->discard_zeroes_if_aligned;
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> blk_set_stacking_limits(&q->limits);
> @@ -1292,7 +1294,7 @@ static void drbd_setup_queue_param(struct drbd_device *device, struct drbd_backi
> /* This is the workaround for "bio would need to, but cannot, be split" */
> blk_queue_max_segments(q, max_segments ? max_segments : BLK_MAX_SEGMENTS);
> blk_queue_segment_boundary(q, PAGE_SIZE-1);
> - decide_on_discard_support(device, q, b, discard_zeroes_if_aligned);
> + decide_on_discard_support(device, bdev);
>
> if (b) {
> blk_stack_limits(&q->limits, &b->limits, 0);
Acked-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder at linbit.com>
More information about the drbd-dev
mailing list