[Drbd-dev] is it ok to always pull in sctp for dlm, was: Re: [PATCH 27/33] sctp: export sctp_setsockopt_bindx
teigland at redhat.com
Sat Jun 13 12:07:45 CEST 2020
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:40:40PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 03:00:58PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:26:42AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > And call it directly from dlm instead of going through kernel_setsockopt.
> > The advantage on using kernel_setsockopt here is that sctp module will
> > only be loaded if dlm actually creates a SCTP socket. With this
> > change, sctp will be loaded on setups that may not be actually using
> > it. It's a quite big module and might expose the system.
> > I'm okay with the SCTP changes, but I'll defer to DLM folks to whether
> > that's too bad or what for DLM.
> So for ipv6 I could just move the helpers inline as they were trivial
> and avoid that issue. But some of the sctp stuff really is way too
> big for that, so the only other option would be to use symbol_get.
Let's try symbol_get, having the sctp module always loaded caused problems
last time it happened (almost nobody uses dlm with it.)
More information about the drbd-dev