[Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd: fix discard_zeroes_if_aligned regression
drbd-dev at lists.ewheeler.net
Wed Jan 17 01:43:35 CET 2018
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> NAK. Calling a discard and expecting zeroing is simply buggy.
But of course, that would be silly.
We don't expect discard to zero---but we do expect discard to discard!
> And double NAK for patches like this without a linux-block Cc.
My appologies, I thought this was internal to DRBD.
What is the general rule here?
Should linux-block always be Cc'ed with a patch?
More information about the drbd-dev