[Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd: fix discard_zeroes_if_aligned regression

Eric Wheeler drbd-dev at lists.ewheeler.net
Wed Jan 17 01:43:35 CET 2018

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> NAK.  Calling a discard and expecting zeroing is simply buggy.

But of course, that would be silly.

We don't expect discard to zero---but we do expect discard to discard!

> And double NAK for patches like this without a linux-block Cc.

My appologies, I thought this was internal to DRBD.  

What is the general rule here?

Should linux-block always be Cc'ed with a patch?

Eric Wheeler

More information about the drbd-dev mailing list