[Drbd-dev] [PATCH 23/27] drbd: make intelligent use of blkdev_issue_zeroout
Eric Wheeler
drbd-dev at lists.ewheeler.net
Sat Jan 13 01:46:40 CET 2018
Hello All,
We just noticed that discards to DRBD devices backed by dm-thin devices
are fully allocating the thin blocks.
This behavior does not exist before
ee472d83 block: add a flags argument to (__)blkdev_issue_zeroout
The problem exists somewhere between
[working] c20cfc27 block: stop using blkdev_issue_write_same for zeroing
and
[broken] 45c21793 drbd: implement REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES
Note that c20cfc27 works as expected, but 45c21793 discards blocks
being zeroed on the dm-thin backing device. All commits between those two
produce the following error:
blkdiscard: /dev/drbd/by-res/test: BLKDISCARD ioctl failed: Input/output error
Also note that issuing a blkdiscard to the backing device directly
discards as you would expect. This is just a problem when sending discards
through DRBD.
Is there an easy way to solve this in the short term, even if the ultimate
fix is more involved?
Thank you for your help!
-Eric
--
Eric Wheeler
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> drbd always wants its discard wire operations to zero the blocks, so
> use blkdev_issue_zeroout with the BLKDEV_ZERO_UNMAP flag instead of
> reinventing it poorly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c | 3 --
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h | 6 ---
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 102 ++-----------------------------------
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c | 6 +--
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c
> index de5c3ee8a790..494837e59f23 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c
> @@ -236,9 +236,6 @@ static void seq_print_peer_request_flags(struct seq_file *m, struct drbd_peer_re
> seq_print_rq_state_bit(m, f & EE_CALL_AL_COMPLETE_IO, &sep, "in-AL");
> seq_print_rq_state_bit(m, f & EE_SEND_WRITE_ACK, &sep, "C");
> seq_print_rq_state_bit(m, f & EE_MAY_SET_IN_SYNC, &sep, "set-in-sync");
> -
> - if (f & EE_IS_TRIM)
> - __seq_print_rq_state_bit(m, f & EE_IS_TRIM_USE_ZEROOUT, &sep, "zero-out", "trim");
> seq_print_rq_state_bit(m, f & EE_WRITE_SAME, &sep, "write-same");
> seq_putc(m, '\n');
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
> index 724d1c50fc52..d5da45bb03a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
> @@ -437,9 +437,6 @@ enum {
>
> /* is this a TRIM aka REQ_DISCARD? */
> __EE_IS_TRIM,
> - /* our lower level cannot handle trim,
> - * and we want to fall back to zeroout instead */
> - __EE_IS_TRIM_USE_ZEROOUT,
>
> /* In case a barrier failed,
> * we need to resubmit without the barrier flag. */
> @@ -482,7 +479,6 @@ enum {
> #define EE_CALL_AL_COMPLETE_IO (1<<__EE_CALL_AL_COMPLETE_IO)
> #define EE_MAY_SET_IN_SYNC (1<<__EE_MAY_SET_IN_SYNC)
> #define EE_IS_TRIM (1<<__EE_IS_TRIM)
> -#define EE_IS_TRIM_USE_ZEROOUT (1<<__EE_IS_TRIM_USE_ZEROOUT)
> #define EE_RESUBMITTED (1<<__EE_RESUBMITTED)
> #define EE_WAS_ERROR (1<<__EE_WAS_ERROR)
> #define EE_HAS_DIGEST (1<<__EE_HAS_DIGEST)
> @@ -1561,8 +1557,6 @@ extern void start_resync_timer_fn(unsigned long data);
> extern void drbd_endio_write_sec_final(struct drbd_peer_request *peer_req);
>
> /* drbd_receiver.c */
> -extern int drbd_issue_discard_or_zero_out(struct drbd_device *device,
> - sector_t start, unsigned int nr_sectors, bool discard);
> extern int drbd_receiver(struct drbd_thread *thi);
> extern int drbd_ack_receiver(struct drbd_thread *thi);
> extern void drbd_send_ping_wf(struct work_struct *ws);
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
> index dc9a6dcd431c..bc1d296581f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
> @@ -1448,108 +1448,14 @@ void drbd_bump_write_ordering(struct drbd_resource *resource, struct drbd_backin
> drbd_info(resource, "Method to ensure write ordering: %s\n", write_ordering_str[resource->write_ordering]);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * We *may* ignore the discard-zeroes-data setting, if so configured.
> - *
> - * Assumption is that it "discard_zeroes_data=0" is only because the backend
> - * may ignore partial unaligned discards.
> - *
> - * LVM/DM thin as of at least
> - * LVM version: 2.02.115(2)-RHEL7 (2015-01-28)
> - * Library version: 1.02.93-RHEL7 (2015-01-28)
> - * Driver version: 4.29.0
> - * still behaves this way.
> - *
> - * For unaligned (wrt. alignment and granularity) or too small discards,
> - * we zero-out the initial (and/or) trailing unaligned partial chunks,
> - * but discard all the aligned full chunks.
> - *
> - * At least for LVM/DM thin, the result is effectively "discard_zeroes_data=1".
> - */
> -int drbd_issue_discard_or_zero_out(struct drbd_device *device, sector_t start, unsigned int nr_sectors, bool discard)
> -{
> - struct block_device *bdev = device->ldev->backing_bdev;
> - struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> - sector_t tmp, nr;
> - unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
> - int alignment;
> - int err = 0;
> -
> - if (!discard)
> - goto zero_out;
> -
> - /* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same. */
> - granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
> - alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) % granularity;
> -
> - max_discard_sectors = min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, (1U << 22));
> - max_discard_sectors -= max_discard_sectors % granularity;
> - if (unlikely(!max_discard_sectors))
> - goto zero_out;
> -
> - if (nr_sectors < granularity)
> - goto zero_out;
> -
> - tmp = start;
> - if (sector_div(tmp, granularity) != alignment) {
> - if (nr_sectors < 2*granularity)
> - goto zero_out;
> - /* start + gran - (start + gran - align) % gran */
> - tmp = start + granularity - alignment;
> - tmp = start + granularity - sector_div(tmp, granularity);
> -
> - nr = tmp - start;
> - err |= blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, start, nr, GFP_NOIO,
> - BLKDEV_ZERO_NOUNMAP);
> - nr_sectors -= nr;
> - start = tmp;
> - }
> - while (nr_sectors >= granularity) {
> - nr = min_t(sector_t, nr_sectors, max_discard_sectors);
> - err |= blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, start, nr, GFP_NOIO,
> - BLKDEV_ZERO_NOUNMAP);
> - nr_sectors -= nr;
> - start += nr;
> - }
> - zero_out:
> - if (nr_sectors) {
> - err |= blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, start, nr_sectors, GFP_NOIO,
> - BLKDEV_ZERO_NOUNMAP);
> - }
> - return err != 0;
> -}
> -
> -static bool can_do_reliable_discards(struct drbd_device *device)
> -{
> - struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(device->ldev->backing_bdev);
> - struct disk_conf *dc;
> - bool can_do;
> -
> - if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
> - return false;
> -
> - if (q->limits.discard_zeroes_data)
> - return true;
> -
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - dc = rcu_dereference(device->ldev->disk_conf);
> - can_do = dc->discard_zeroes_if_aligned;
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - return can_do;
> -}
> -
> static void drbd_issue_peer_discard(struct drbd_device *device, struct drbd_peer_request *peer_req)
> {
> - /* If the backend cannot discard, or does not guarantee
> - * read-back zeroes in discarded ranges, we fall back to
> - * zero-out. Unless configuration specifically requested
> - * otherwise. */
> - if (!can_do_reliable_discards(device))
> - peer_req->flags |= EE_IS_TRIM_USE_ZEROOUT;
> + struct block_device *bdev = device->ldev->backing_bdev;
>
> - if (drbd_issue_discard_or_zero_out(device, peer_req->i.sector,
> - peer_req->i.size >> 9, !(peer_req->flags & EE_IS_TRIM_USE_ZEROOUT)))
> + if (blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, peer_req->i.sector, peer_req->i.size >> 9,
> + GFP_NOIO, 0))
> peer_req->flags |= EE_WAS_ERROR;
> +
> drbd_endio_write_sec_final(peer_req);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
> index 652114ae1a8a..6da9ea8c48b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
> @@ -1148,10 +1148,10 @@ static int drbd_process_write_request(struct drbd_request *req)
>
> static void drbd_process_discard_req(struct drbd_request *req)
> {
> - int err = drbd_issue_discard_or_zero_out(req->device,
> - req->i.sector, req->i.size >> 9, true);
> + struct block_device *bdev = req->device->ldev->backing_bdev;
>
> - if (err)
> + if (blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, req->i.sector, req->i.size >> 9,
> + GFP_NOIO, 0))
> req->private_bio->bi_error = -EIO;
> bio_endio(req->private_bio);
> }
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> drbd-dev mailing list
> drbd-dev at lists.linbit.com
> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-dev
>
More information about the drbd-dev
mailing list