[Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd: use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail

[Wei Yongjun]

From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei at trendmicro.com.cn>

Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail().

spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei at trendmicro.com.cn>
---
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
index 6bce2cc..a196281 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
@@ -141,8 +141,7 @@ static void drbd_endio_write_sec_final(struct drbd_epoch_entry *e) __releases(lo
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->req_lock, flags);
 	mdev->writ_cnt += e->size >> 9;
-	list_del(&e->w.list); /* has been on active_ee or sync_ee */
-	list_add_tail(&e->w.list, &mdev->done_ee);
+	list_move_tail(&e->w.list, &mdev->done_ee);
 
 	/* No hlist_del_init(&e->collision) here, we did not send the Ack yet,
 	 * neither did we wake possibly waiting conflicting requests.