[Drbd-dev] [patch] drbd: cleanup: change "<= 0" to "== 0"
Philipp Reisner
philipp.reisner at linbit.com
Tue Aug 24 11:10:37 CEST 2010
Am Dienstag, 24. August 2010, um 10:41:31 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On 2010-08-24 10:38, Philipp Reisner wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 12. August 2010, um 00:38:45 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> >> dt is unsigned so it's never less than zero. We are calculating the
> >> elapsed time, and that's never less than zero (unless there is a bug or
> >> we invent time travel). The comparison here is just to guard against
> >> divide by zero bugs.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
> >> b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c index be3374b..4c0c4aa 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
> >> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static void drbd_syncer_progress(struct drbd_conf
> >> *mdev, struct seq_file *seq) /* mean speed since syncer started
> >>
> >> * we do account for PausedSync periods */
> >>
> >> dt = (jiffies - mdev->rs_start - mdev->rs_paused) / HZ;
> >>
> >> - if (dt <= 0)
> >> + if (dt == 0)
> >>
> >> dt = 1;
> >>
> >> db = mdev->rs_total - rs_left;
> >> dbdt = Bit2KB(db/dt);
> >
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Please elaborate the improvement this patch brings.
> > dt can actually get negative, on jiffie wrap. I see
> > little value in displaying then a negative resync speed...
>
> Aren't all members unsigned long? If not, then you have
> another bug.
Um, well that is right. Ok, patch goes in.
Best,
Phil
--
: Dipl-Ing Philipp Reisner
: LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
: Tel: +43-1-8178292-50, Fax: +43-1-8178292-82
: http://www.linbit.com
DRBD(R) and LINBIT(R) are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
More information about the drbd-dev
mailing list