[Drbd-dev] Another drbd race
lmb at suse.de
Wed Sep 8 13:20:01 CEST 2004
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner at linbit.com> said:
> No. It would be better to have a "drbdadm fence r0" operation on N2!
> The "drbdadm fence r0" command would only set the "Outdated" flag.
Well, it's automatically supposed to assume it's outdated when it
crashes in S-P mode.
When the secondary loses connection to the primary, a mark-peer-dead
would prevent that flag from being set.
So, why an explicit drbdadm fence operation? I'm missing what that would
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb at suse.de>
High Availability & Clustering \\\ ///
SUSE Labs, Research and Development \honk/
SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company \\//
More information about the drbd-dev