[Csync2] csync2 without gnutls-openssl?

[Michael Mansour]

Hi,

Can someone produce (or has someone produced) RHEL 5-compatible csync2 RPM's
with these patches?

That has been one of the hardest things for me over the years to maintain with
csync2. I make my own RPM's but since RH have performed their updates some of
the csync2 clusters have broken (segmentation faults) and I've tried to fix
them, but can't.

Having a repository storing csync2 RPM's somewhere in the world, whether that
be with openssl or not, would be a nice to have.

Regards,

Michael.

> > Isn't it easier to rely on whatever libgnutls-dev ships
> > for integration with autofoo.
> > 
> > I don't like to include compatibility cruft just because we can,
> > or adding new files to version control if a one-line diff would be
> > sufficient.
> > 
> > Anyways, if you insist, how about:
> > 
> > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> > index a3ef7ee..3aa600c 100644
> > --- a/configure.ac
> > +++ b/configure.ac
> > @@ -78,7 +78,14 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE([gnutls],
> >  if test "$enable_gnutls" != no
> >  then
> >  	# Check for gnuTLS.
> > -	AM_PATH_LIBGNUTLS(1.0.0, , [ AC_MSG_ERROR([[gnutls not found;
> > install gnutls, gnutls-openssl and libtasn1 packages for your system or
> > run configure with --disable-gnutls]]) ])
> > +	PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBGNUTLS, gnutls >= 1.0.0,, [
> > +		ifdef([AM_PATH_LIBGNUTLS],
> > +			[AM_PATH_LIBGNUTLS(1.0.0, , AC_MSG_ERROR([[gnutls
> not
> > found; install gnutls and libtasn1 packages for your system or run
> > configure with --disable-gnutls]]))],
> > +			[AC_MSG_ERROR([
> > +***  Neither pkg-config nor older .m4 macros found for libgnutls.
> > +***  Install libgnutls development packages and rerun autogen.sh,
> > +***  or --disable-gnutls])])
> > +	])
> 
> This is fine to me: most of the stuff in the libgnutls.m4 I dropped 
> to this list was from the gnutls project. Nevertheless, I too 
> believe it was a bit pedantic in checking libgnutls usability...
> 
> Your solution seems clever to me.
> 
> I don't agree with you to not have a copy of m4/pkg.m4 and/or
> m4/libgnutls.m4. But I don't even agree with the gnutls project shipping
> macros named AM_PATH_LIBGNUTLS (the AM_ prefix is misleading: it is 
> not a macro supplied by automake...). So, after all this is not 
> important as long as csync2 comes out with a working "configure" 
> script: it is a matter of taste at best...
> 
> +1 for me
> 
> Giampaolo
> 
> >  	## This is a bloody hack for fedora core
> >  	CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $LIBGNUTLS_CFLAGS"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Csync2 mailing list
> Csync2 at lists.linbit.com
> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2
------- End of Original Message -------