Sqlite 3 (was: [Csync2] Csync2 Maintainership)

[Dennis Schafroth]

Hey all,

The idea with different file extensions is good.

There is something an error in my backup code... so I will think it  
will be best only to use the sqlite3 stuff. If needed I will extract  
that from the patch.

It would be great to add some stuff to autoconf to look for sqlite3 or  
sqlite2, but I do not have the knowledge.

cheers,
Dennis

On 17/02/2008, at 10.30, Clifford Wolf wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 04:53:03AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>>> .. sqlite3 patch ..
>>
>> once I get a lot of confirmation that it is working fine,
>> and/or the time to confirm it myself :)
>>
>> so, does it work for you?
>> did anyone but the poster actually use this patch?
>
> I haven't had a look at the patch but just want to say:
>
> Pls make sure that the sqlite3 database file names have different  
> names
> (i.e. file extensions) than the sqlite2 database file names. This  
> would
> provide at least the posibility for a relatively clean update from  
> sqlite2
> based installations to sqlite3: csync2 would just behave as in a fresh
> installed system and detect that all the files (hopeflly) are  
> already in
> sync..
>
> yours,
> - clifford
>
> -- 
> "Perfection [in design] is achieved not when there is nothing left to
> add, but rather when there is nothing left to take away."
> - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
> _______________________________________________
> Csync2 mailing list
> Csync2 at lists.linbit.com
> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2
>