[Csync2] Csync2 Maintainership

[Michael Mansour]

Hi Lars,

> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 03:58:35PM +0100, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > * Clifford Wolf <clifford at clifford.at> [2008-02-16 13:42]:
> > > that said I have decided to turn over csync2 maintainership to Lars
> > > Ellenberg from LINBIT, who is already good known on this list for
> > > answereing all that questions that I was lazy enough to ignore the last
> > > years..
> > 
> > Great to hear^Wread that csync2 is now being actively maintained again :)
> > Thanks, Clifford and Lars!
> 
> as long as you don't mix up maintenance and development, my pleasure.
> 
> otherwise, there would be a slight misunderstanding here.
> 
> just to clarify, for now csync2 remains in the mode it has been for a
> while now, namely:
>  * as long as it does what we [LinBit] use it for, which is typically
>    the synchronisation of a few dozend configuration files over a bunch
>    of hosts, there will be no development.
>  * if there is a serious bug preventing it from doing so reliably,
>    that would be tracked down and fixed.
>  * if somebody comes up with a cleanly coded patch,
>    and a good reason for it, it is likely to be merged.

Can you include the sqlite3 patch provided in the mailing list to the current
csync2 codebase?

The problem with the sqlite2 is that as Linux distributions keep updating,
it's being left behind in favour of sqlite3.

Personally I'd prefer not to keep manually forcing an install of sqlite2
everytime I deploy a new server, just for csync2 (as it's the only package
that uses it). sqlite3 is installed by default on the distributions I run.

What you think?

Michael.

> there is currently no active development.
> 
> 	Lars
> _______________________________________________
> Csync2 mailing list
> Csync2 at lists.linbit.com
> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2
------- End of Original Message -------