<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 18/08/21 05:39, Eric Robinson ha
scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CO1PR03MB5873227A658D86C1DD14B18CFAFF9@CO1PR03MB5873.namprd03.prod.outlook.com">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">I’m considering deploying DRBD between ZFS
layers. The lowest layer RAIDZ will serve as the DRBD backing
device.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Hi Eric,</p>
<p>I'm using drbd over zfs raid 10 ssd without problems.</p>
<p>As I know, RAIDZ has bad performances with block devices, so I
advise you raid 10<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CO1PR03MB5873227A658D86C1DD14B18CFAFF9@CO1PR03MB5873.namprd03.prod.outlook.com">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"> Then I would build another ZFS filesystem
on top to benefit from compression. Any thoughs, experiences,
opinions, positive or negative?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">--Eric</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>You don't need this, zfs on the first layer already compresses
the data.</p>
<p>Furthermore, zfs works better with physical disks</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Emmanuel Florac, zfs replication is <span class="Y2IQFc"
lang="en">asynchronous, even you can set it every minute, you
always lose some data after a node failure</span></p>
<p><span class="Y2IQFc" lang="en">Denis</span></p>
</body>
</html>