<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 09:39:45 Roland Kammerer wrote:<br>
</p>
<pre>> Correct. That depends a bit on who of us does the moderation. I usually
> clear the moderation flag after some time when the name feels familiar
> and I know the person isn't a spam bot...
</pre>
<p>I think I've figured this out now, I'll hopefully be getting the
hang of posting. :)</p>
<p>On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 19:34:44 Eddie Chapman wrote:</p>
<pre>> Personally I would just upgrade to drbd 9 and then you don't have to
> wait for the above process :-) (as the issue only affects drbd 8)
</pre>
<p>Hm, I'm taking a wild guess here and say that I will also have to
upgrade to drbd 9 on the server where my secondary is placed? Or
would that not be a problem, just upgrading on my computer and
then not upgrading the server. The problem here ist, that we're
five people running our primary virtual machines on our computers
and have only one server where the secondary vms are kept. Would
we all need to upgrade, or is it just enough that I upgrade the
drbd on my computer now and wait with upgrading the server until
everyone has upgraded their drbd? Do you guys have any experience
with that?</p>
<p>Thanks again for the great help and making me understand a lot
more about drbd!<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>