<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/10/17 07:55, Gandalf
      Corvotempesta wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJH6TXjKPSEN9qMVdioOk7GGu=y5pPnOE9iZ1EJcwsWi1=S+ow@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="auto">For this project I'll use v8
        <div dir="auto">As I would like to use just one big resource, I
          don't think v9 would be able to rebalance a single resource
          across 4 or 5 nodes</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    v9 would allow for a 3 node mirror, which improves redundancy and
    resiliency, and I assume makes split-brain avoidance much
    simpler/more reliable to stonith the right node.<br>
    <br>
    For me, I mainly still use v8 in production.<br>
    <br>
    Regards,<br>
    Adam<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJH6TXjKPSEN9qMVdioOk7GGu=y5pPnOE9iZ1EJcwsWi1=S+ow@mail.gmail.com">
      <div class="gmail_extra">
        <div class="gmail_quote">Il 11 ott 2017 10:48 PM, "Yannis
          Milios" &lt;<a href="mailto:yannis.milios@gmail.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true">yannis.milios@gmail.com</a>&gt; ha
          scritto:<br type="attribution">
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div dir="auto">Are you planning to use DRBD8 or DRBD9?</div>
              <div dir="auto"><br>
              </div>
              <div dir="auto">DRBD8 is limited to 2 nodes(max 3).</div>
              <div dir="auto">DRBD9 can scale to multiple nodes.</div>
              <div dir="auto"><br>
              </div>
              <div dir="auto">For DRBD8 the most common setup is RAID
                -&gt; DRBD -&gt; LVM  or  RAID -&gt; LVM -&gt; DRBD</div>
              <div dir="auto">It’s management is way easier than DRBD9.</div>
              <div dir="auto"><br>
              </div>
              <div dir="auto">The most common DRBD9 setups are RAID
                -&gt; LVM (thin or thick) -&gt; DRBD  or  HDD  -&gt;
                 ZFS (thin or thick)  -&gt;  DRBD.</div>
              <div dir="auto">Complicated management...  <br>
              </div>
              <br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div>On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 at 20:52, Gandalf Corvotempesta
                  &lt;<a href="mailto:gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.<wbr>com</a>&gt;
                  wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                  .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">2017-10-11
                  21:22 GMT+02:00 Adam Goryachev &lt;<a
                    href="mailto:mailinglists@websitemanagers.com.au"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">mailinglists@websitemanagers.<wbr>com.au</a>&gt;:<br>
                  &gt; You can also do that with raid + lvm + drbd...
                  you just need to create a new<br>
                  &gt; drbd as you add a new LV, and also resize the
                  drbd after you resize the LV.<br>
                  <br>
                  I prefere to keep drbd as minimum. I'm much more
                  familiar with LVM.<br>
                  If not an issue, i prefere to keep the number of drbd
                  resources as bare minimum.<br>
                  <br>
                  &gt; If both drives fail on one node, then raid will
                  pass the disk errors up to<br>
                  &gt; DRBD, which will mark the local storage as down,
                  and yes, it will read all<br>
                  &gt; needed data from remote node (writes are always
                  sent to the remote node).<br>
                  &gt; You would probably want to migrate the remote
                  node to primary as quickly as<br>
                  &gt; possible, and then work on fixing the storage.<br>
                  <br>
                  Why should I migrate the remote node to primary? Any
                  advantage?<br>
                  <br>
                  &gt; Yes, it is not some bizarre configuration that
                  has never been seen before.<br>
                  &gt; You also haven't mentioned the size of your
                  proposed raid, nor what size you<br>
                  &gt; are planning on growing it to?<br>
                  <br>
                  Currently, I'm planning to start with 2TB disks. I
                  don't think to go<br>
                  over 10-12TB<br>
                  <br>
                  &gt; Yes, you will always want multiple network paths
                  between the two nodes, and<br>
                  &gt; also fencing. bonding can be used to improve
                  performance, but you should<br>
                  &gt; *also* have an additional network or serial or
                  other connection between the<br>
                  &gt; two nodes which is used for fencing.<br>
                  <br>
                  Ok.<br>
                  <br>
                  Any "bare-metal" distribution with DRBD or detailed
                  guide on how to<br>
                  implement HA?<br>
                  Something like FreeNAS, or similiar.<br>
                  ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                  drbd-user mailing list<br>
                  <a href="mailto:drbd-user@lists.linbit.com"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">drbd-user@lists.linbit.com</a><br>
                  <a
                    href="http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.linbit.com/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/drbd-user</a><br>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div dir="ltr">-- <br>
            </div>
            <div class="m_282225625723366107gmail_signature"
              data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Sent from Gmail Mobile</div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Adam Goryachev
      Website Managers
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.websitemanagers.com.au">www.websitemanagers.com.au</a></div>
  <div style=3D"clear: both;width:100%;"><br><span style=3D"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; clear: both;">-- 
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message
in error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and delete the
message from your computer. Viruses - Any loss/damage incurred by receiving
this email is not the sender's responsibility.</span><br></div>
</body>
</html>