<div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 12 Oct 2017 5:10 am, "Gandalf Corvotempesta" <<a href="mailto:gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com">gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Previously i've asked about DRBDv9+ZFS.<br>
Let's assume a more "standard" setup with DRBDv8 + mdadm.<br>
<br>
What I would like to archieve is a simple redundant SAN. (anything<br>
preconfigured for this ?)<br>
<br>
Which is best, raid1+drbd+lvm or drbd+raid1+lvm?<br>
<br>
Any advantage by creating multiple drbd resources ? I think that a<br>
single DRBD resource is better for administrative point of view.<br>
<br>
A simple failover would be enough, I don't need master-master <br></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto">In that case you might go with raid -> lvm -> drbd -> lvm to benefit from lvm in both layers</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>