<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#0563C1;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#954F72;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:windowtext;}
MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><!--ppd1000037-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">We have many DRBD clusters in production and it has always worked great. Our cluster nodes have always had RAID 5 arrays consisting 6x spinning drives. Recently we started using servers with SSD drives. After some research, we find that
RAID 5 is not recommended because it (supposedly) causes write amplification and shortens the life of the drives. However, we really do not want to give up storage space by switching to RAID 10. We are seriously considering using RAID 0 in our database servers,
and using DRBD as “network RAID 1.” What do you guys think of that? Terrible idea?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">--<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eric Robinson<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<BR><BR><FONT color=silver><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt; COLOR: gray; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><FONT size=1>Disclaimer - July 23, 2014</FONT></FONT></SPAN></FONT> <P></P><FONT size=1><FONT face=Verdana color=gray><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt; COLOR: gray; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">This email and any files <FONT size=1>transmitted</FONT> with it are confidential and intended solely for <STRONG>drbd-user@lists.linbit.com</STRONG></SPAN></FONT><FONT face=Verdana color=gray><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 7.5pt; COLOR: gray; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select Management. Warning: Although Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select Management has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></body>
</html>