<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div><div>On 21 Oct 2011, at 07:22, Arnold Krille wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: monospace; ">I toyed with ocfs2 for about two days. Then I just went for gfs2 and since<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br>then our dual-primary system is providing the storage for the virtual systems<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br>just fine. That is we mostly use files as disks for the VMs. If you are okay<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br>with clustered lvm, you can also do that. But as far as I see it, that is<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br>harder to extend unless you export the underlying drbd-resource via iscsi/AoE<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br>to the third and folowing nodes.<br>With gfs2 (or ocfs2) the third node can just mount the same dir via nfs.<br></span></span></blockquote></div><br><div>If you don't mind my asking: Which distro are you using for your GFS2 cluster?</div><div><br></div><div>Nick</div></body></html>