So, to use automatic policy, Do I need use handlers and fencing too ?<div><br></div><div>Best Regards,</div><div>Fernando</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/6/21 Joseph L. Casale <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jcasale@activenetwerx.com">jcasale@activenetwerx.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">>Hi Joseph, thanks for you answer.<br>
><br>
>I'm using ocfs2 and o2cb driver cluster. With my settings, always when I have split brain situation one node is Standole and the other WFConnection.<br>
><br>
>Only when I setup the after-sb-2pri disconnect, the two nodes are Standalone, so I execute the manual split brain recovery.<br>
><br>
>I want setup a automatic policy to recovery.<br>
<br>
</div>Use text mail and reply on list to keep the thread complete and<br>
benefit from the more experienced people on this list.<br>
<br>
Anyway, I understood this from your initial post: I pointed you<br>
to a doc that showed some possible configuration of drbd.conf<br>
under similar circumstances.<br>
<br>
If you read his config, he uses:<br>
<br>
disk {<br>
fencing resource-and-stonith;<br>
}<br>
<br>
Which needs a handler (He wrote his own):<br>
<br>
handlers {<br>
outdate-peer "/sbin/obliterate-peer.sh";<br>
}<br>
<br>
Note the net config difference? Both nodes are active, so this calls<br>
possible for some different handling of SB symptom.<br>
<br>
The difference is your using OCFS2 and not GFS{2} but it details a logical<br>
procedure. Essentially, the config params you seem to be using are not<br>
applicable to an active/active setup.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
jlc<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
drbd-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:drbd-user@lists.linbit.com">drbd-user@lists.linbit.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user" target="_blank">http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>