[DRBD-user] Some info

Igor Cicimov igorc at encompasscorporation.com
Wed Oct 11 23:54:12 CEST 2017

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


On 12 Oct 2017 5:10 am, "Gandalf Corvotempesta" <
gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote:

Previously i've asked about DRBDv9+ZFS.
Let's assume a more "standard" setup with DRBDv8 + mdadm.

What I would like to archieve is a simple redundant SAN. (anything
preconfigured for this ?)

Which is best, raid1+drbd+lvm or drbd+raid1+lvm?

Any advantage by creating multiple drbd resources ? I think that a
single DRBD resource is better for administrative point of view.

A simple failover would be enough, I don't need master-master


In that case you might go with raid -> lvm -> drbd -> lvm to benefit from
lvm in both layers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20171012/6bb3449c/attachment.htm>


More information about the drbd-user mailing list