Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:36:12PM +1000, Adam Goryachev wrote: > > > On 29/04/2016 18:40, Roland Kammerer wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:21:17AM +1000, Adam Goryachev wrote: > >>When upgrading from python-drbdmanage 0.94-1 to 0.95-1 using the packages > >>available at: > >>http://oss.linbit.com/drbdmanage/packages/drbdmanage-0.95/debian-jessie/ > >> > >>The following is the output: > >>dpkg -i python-drbdmanage_0.95-1_all.deb > >>(Reading database ... 48347 files and directories currently installed.) > >>Preparing to unpack python-drbdmanage_0.95-1_all.deb ... > >>Unpacking python-drbdmanage (0.95-1) over (0.94-1) ... > >>Setting up python-drbdmanage (0.95-1) ... > >>Job for drbdmanaged.socket failed. See 'systemctl status drbdmanaged.socket' > >>and 'journalctl -xn' for details. > >>Processing triggers for dbus (1.8.20-0+deb8u1) ... > >>Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-5) ... > >> > >>systemctl status drbdmanaged.socket > >>● drbdmanaged.socket - DRBDManage Service > >> Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/drbdmanaged.socket; enabled) > >> Active: inactive (dead) since Fri 2016-04-29 09:15:04 AEST; 46s ago > >> Listen: [::]:6996 (Stream) > >> > >>drbdmanage still shows that it is running and working (presumably the old > >>version). Doing a reboot solves the problem, but I would think the package > >>upgrade should handle this more smoothly. Any suggestions or ideas? > >Is this a satellite node or a control node? > Control node. Then you don't need socket activation at all. systemd disable/stop it. > > I repeated the same upgrade on a second control node, with identical > results. > >How was that enabled at all in the first place? By you or was it picked > >up "magically" by systemd? > > > > > I didn't do anything more than install the python-drbdmanage package, so > either the package did something to make it work, or else systemd > "magically" picked it up. Hm, should not happen, but I will check that in a clean environment. Just to be sure about the test case: - installed 0.94 - played around with it - upgraded to 0.95 - *never ever* touched any sytemd foo manually correct? Regards, rck