Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Hello,
my problem seems to be related to interaction between e1000e module,
drbd and Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit nic. Each of them works fine
when at least one of the other two is not present.
I edited an udev rule to switch eth1 to eth0 and viceversa. My eth1 is
now Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit nic and drbd works so fine...
Thanks anyway
Max
Il 26/08/2013 07:15, drbd-user-request at lists.linbit.com ha scritto:
> Send drbd-user mailing list submissions to
> drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> drbd-user-request at lists.linbit.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> drbd-user-owner at lists.linbit.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of drbd-user digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. DRDB over Software RAID1 - Failure: (104) Can not open
> backing device (Martin Krammer, New Media Interactive)
> 2. Re: Building DRBD RPM (Patrick Lists)
> 3. drbd /proc/diskstats counter issue (Justin Albstmeijer)
> 4. Primary / Unknown (Victor Beliz?rio)
> 5. initial sync does not start (sciabica.massimilian at tiscali.it)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:15:35 +0000
> From: "Martin Krammer, New Media Interactive" <mk at nmi1.com>
> Subject: [DRBD-user] DRDB over Software RAID1 - Failure: (104) Can not
> open backing device
> To: "drbd-user at lists.linbit.com" <drbd-user at lists.linbit.com>
> Message-ID:
> <F10AE3F83F67734C94CA3B683026CBAA278B93A9 at DB3PRD0610MB356.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I have two webservers running debian 7 (stable) with software RAID1 and DRBD 8.3.11.
> On both servers there are the following shares, which should be connected:
>
> On stella: /dev/md4 919014380 204664 872126436 1% /srv
> On laura: /dev/md4 442143360 153168996 266514700 37% /srv
>
> Later, the data of laura should be syncronized on /dev/drdb1.
>
> The conf-file looks like:
>
> resource r1 {
> on stella {
> device /dev/drbd1;
> disk /dev/md4;
> address 192.168.1.1:7789;
> meta-disk /dev/sdb3[0];
> }
> on laura {
> device /dev/drbd1;
> disk /dev/md4;
> address 192.168.1.2:7789;
> meta-disk /dev/sdb2[0];
> }
> }
>
> If I try to attach...
>
> root at stella:/srv# drbdadm attach r1
>
> --== Thank you for participating in the global usage survey ==--
> The server's response is:
>
> node already registered
> 1: Failure: (104) Can not open backing device.
> Command 'drbdsetup 1 disk /dev/md4 /dev/sdb3 0 --set-defaults --create-device --on-io-error=detach' terminated with exit code 10
>
> Could anybody help me please?
>
> Martin.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20130819/756e9889/attachment.htm>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:19:34 +0200
> From: Patrick Lists <drbd-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl>
> Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] Building DRBD RPM
> To: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
> Message-ID: <52120D56.6030709 at puzzled.xs4all.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 08/19/2013 01:55 PM, Goutam Baul wrote:
>> Dear List,
>>
>> We plan to use DRBD 8.4.3 with Redhat Cluster Suit. Our plan is to
>> replicate data between the Data Center and the Disaster Recovery site
>> using DRBD while the service at the Data Center run over two nodes as an
>> active-passive redhat cluster. We have downloaded the drbd-8.4.3.tar.gz
>> file and tried to build the rpm using the command
>>
>> ./configure --with-km --with-rgmanager --enable-spec --with-distro=redhat
>>
>> But the drbd-rgmanager rpm is not getting created. The list of rpm
>> created is
> Maybe have a look at the drbd srpm from elrepo.org to see if it gives a
> clue. They have been providing drbd rpms for EL6 for a long time.
>
> Regards,
> Patrick
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:04:32 +0200
> From: Justin Albstmeijer <justin at vlamea.nl>
> Subject: [DRBD-user] drbd /proc/diskstats counter issue
> To: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
> Message-ID: <1377007472.2745.19.camel at 192.168.2.5>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi,
>
> I am monitoring the "# of I/Os currently in progress"
> from /proc/diskstats for our drbd devices.
> After upgrading from drbd-8.4.1 to drbd-8.4.3 this counter does not seem
> to behave as advertised.
>
> Field 9 -- # of I/Os currently in progress
> The only field that should go to zero. Incremented as requests are
> given to appropriate struct request_queue and decremented as they finish.
>
> It starts at 0 but quickly grows to a value of +4294000000.
> It then seems to stabilize on such high number and fluctuates lightly.
>
> The expected behavior is to settle at 0 and lightly fluctuate.
> The local underlying disks and dm-* devices show normal counter behavior.
> It only seems to impact drbd device counters for which the server it self is primary.
>
> # while true; do cat /proc/diskstats |grep drbd21 | awk {'print $12'}; sleep 10; done
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964313
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964312
> 4294964935
> 4294964312
>
> Any idea what is happening here?
>
> Currently running:
>
> Centos-6
> kernel-2.6.32-358.14.1.el6.x86_64
> drbd-kmdl-2.6.32-358.14.1.el6-8.4.3-33.el6.x86_64
>
> Thank you,
>
> Justin
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:56:58 +0300
> From: Victor Beliz?rio <victor_belizario at hotmail.com>
> Subject: [DRBD-user] Primary / Unknown
> To: "drbd-user at lists.linbit.com" <drbd-user at lists.linbit.com>
> Message-ID: <COL125-W821457C4D8F246E9E2046E84C0 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Guys,
> Please help me.
> I'm a production ambient with 2 servers CentOS 6.4 64 bits, and i have instaled OCFS2 and DRBD 8.3.11, in dual-primary mode. All works fine, file creation, file update and file delete, so i started the tests:
> - reboot the server 01 and check if replication its fine (Ok)- turn off the power of the server 01 and later turn on, and check if replication is fine (OK)- reboot the server 02 and 01 simultaneously, and later check if replication is fine (OK)
> Now, i'm in the test with the network. I did a "ifdown eth0" in the server01, and the cat /proc/drbd are like this :
> version: 8.3.11 (api:88/proto:86-96)srcversion: DA5A13F16DE6553FC7CE9B2m:res cs ro ds p mounted fstype0:tray WFConnection Primary/Unknown UpToDate/DUnknown C
> Ok, its waiting for connection, perfectly. So i turn on again the network, with ifup eth0 and think the state will be Primary / Primary again. But...not happens.
> I make this test a lot of times, and need to restart the drbd service to work again Primary / Primary.
> Have a way to automatically back the sync of the servers?
> Thanks a lot,
> Victor
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20130821/d7817c3e/attachment.htm>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:48:06 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "sciabica.massimilian at tiscali.it"
> <sciabica.massimilian at tiscali.it>
> Subject: [DRBD-user] initial sync does not start
> To: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
> Message-ID:
> <13583485.36681377175686899.JavaMail.defaultUser at defaultHost>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello,I'm re-posting this message as it is not showing up after 5 days since the initial post.
> I'm (try to) running drbd-8.4.3 on a 3.4.54-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 kernel (CentOS6-4 with xen support). I set up my nodes with a resource tier0 resource tier0 { protocol C; startup { degr-wfc-timeout 120; } net { sndbuf-size 0; } disk { on-io-error detach; resync-rate 25M; } syncer { rate 25M; al-extents 3833; verify-alg sha1; } meta-disk internal; on ctb5 { disk /dev/sda3; device /dev/drbd1; address 172.23.10.1:7799; } on ctb6 { disk /dev/sda3; device /dev/drbd1; address 172.23.10.2:7799; }Here is the sequence of commands and status after I zeroed out the partition### Load module, device creation and "drbdadm up $resource" went ok, leading to the Connected state below[root at ctb5 ~]# modprobe drbd[root at ctb5 ~]# drbdadm create-md tier0Writing meta data...initializing activity logNOT initializing bitmapNew drbd meta data block successfully created.success[root at ctb5 ~]# cat /proc/drbdversion: 8.4.3 (api
> :1/proto:86-101)GIT-hash: 89a294209144b68adb3ee85a73221f964d3ee515 build by root at ctb5, 2013-08-18 15:58:37 1: cs:Connected ro:Secondary/Secondary ds:Inconsistent/Inconsistent C r----- ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:0 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:f oos:221273604########A this point, I declared ctb5 as the primary node:[root at ctb5 ~]# drbdadm primary --force tier0[root at ctb5 ~]# cat /proc/drbdversion: 8.4.3 (api:1/proto:86-101)GIT-hash: 89a294209144b68adb3ee85a73221f964d3ee515 build by root at ctb5, 2013-08-18 15:58:37 1: cs:SyncSource ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent C r---n- ns:84 nr:0 dw:0 dr:3736 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:1 ua:3 ap:0 ep:1 wo:f oos:221273604 [>....................] sync'ed: 0.1% (216084/216084)M finish: 307:19:28 speed: 0 (0) K/secThe other node (ctb6) is now aware that this node (ctb5) is primary:[root at ctb6 drbd-8.4.3]# cat /proc/drbdversion: 8.4.3 (api:1/proto:86-101)GIT-hash: 89a294209144b68adb3ee85a73221f964d3ee515 build by root at ctb6, 2013-08-1
> 7 13:13:16 1: cs:SyncTarget ro:Secondary/Primary ds:Inconsistent/UpToDate C r----- ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:0 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:3 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:f oos:221273604 [>....................] sync'ed: 0.1% (216084/216084)M finish: 3073:14:40 speed: 0 (0) want: 0 K/secbut nothing is ever written to disk on the secondary node (speed is 0). And there is "want: 0 K". Why?At last, the loop dialog between the two nodes:drbdsetup events 11376836259 ST 1,tier0[0] { cs:SyncSource ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }278 ST-prev 1,tier0[0] { cs:SyncSource ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }/* long pause here, then */278 ST-new 1,tier0[0] { cs:NetworkFailure ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }278 ST 1,tier0[0] { cs:NetworkFailure ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }279 ST-prev 1,tier0[0] { cs:NetworkFailure ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }279 ST-new 1,tier0[0] { cs:Unconnected ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/I
> nconsistent r--- }279 ST 1,tier0[0] { cs:WFConnection ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }280 ST-prev 1,tier0[0] { cs:Unconnected ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }280 ST-new 1,tier0[0] { cs:WFConnection ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }280 ST 1,tier0[0] { cs:WFConnection ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }281 ST-prev 1,tier0[0] { cs:WFConnection ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }281 ST-new 1,tier0[0] { cs:WFReportParams ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }281 ST 1,tier0[0] { cs:WFReportParams ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }282 ST-prev 1,tier0[0] { cs:WFReportParams ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }282 ST-new 1,tier0[0] { cs:WFBitMapS ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }282 ST 1,tier0[0] { cs:WFBitMapS ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }283 UH 1,tier0[0] before-resync-source284 UH-post 1,tier0[0] before-resync-source
> 0x0000285 ST-prev 1,tier0[0] { cs:WFBitMapS ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }285 ST-new 1,tier0[0] { cs:SyncSource ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }285 ST 1,tier0[0] { cs:SyncSource ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent r--- }/* another long pause... */I used a 8.3 conf file for 8.4. Drbd never complained about anything, so why doesn't it start syncing?Hope someone can help me, thanks.Massimiliano
>
> Invita i tuoi amici e Tiscali ti premia! Il consiglio di un amico vale pi? di uno spot in TV. Per ogni nuovo abbonato 30 ? di premio per te e per lui! Un amico al mese e parli e navighi sempre gratis: http://freelosophy.tiscali.it/
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20130822/84abc6db/attachment.htm>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> drbd-user mailing list
> drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
>
>
> End of drbd-user Digest, Vol 109, Issue 18
> ******************************************