[DRBD-user] drbd wrong lower device doubt

陈楠 chennan.1986 at 163.com
Mon May 21 11:08:54 CEST 2012

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


This feature can give us much more convenient. Do you have any cases to prove it wrong? I need it thank you!



在 2012-05-21 16:50:03,"Felix Frank" <ff at mpexnet.de> 写道:
>On 05/21/2012 10:39 AM, 陈楠 wrote:
>> I configure it like I show. I create metadata on every node and set one
>> disk state to optodate and the other inconsistent, then drbd can sync
>> and heartbeat can failover. Can you tell me the reason? I need the
>> reason to persuade my leader.
>
>Dan has shortly described the reason, as have I in my first mail to this
>thread:
>
>> The idea with the DRBD configs is to tell each node about the whole
>> picture, and each node will pick the information it needs. That's why it
>> can even work when each node sees a slightly different picture.
>> But don't try tricking DRBD, because you will only confuse yourself.
>> Just install the whole, working config on each of your nodes.
>
>Make sure to explain to your manager that installing different configs
>on each DRBD peer is a maintenance nightmare. E.g., in a year, you will
>probably not be able to tell what's supposedly correct anymore.
>
>There is really no reason to set yourself up for future silly mistakes.
>
>Is there any reason your management insists on a messed up configuration?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20120521/9823c35a/attachment.htm>


More information about the drbd-user mailing list