Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
17.8.2012 13:27, Jarno Elonen kirjoitti: > Or maybe this is not a network issue at all? Iperf also seems to indicate that network is probably fine: # iperf -c 172.16.0.1 -u -b 10m -t 30 -i 5 -f m ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 172.16.0.1, UDP port 5001 Sending 1470 byte datagrams UDP buffer size: 0.22 MByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 172.16.0.2 port 50896 connected with 172.16.0.1 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0- 5.0 sec 5.96 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec [ 3] 5.0-10.0 sec 5.96 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec [ 3] 10.0-15.0 sec 5.96 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec [ 3] 15.0-20.0 sec 5.96 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec [ 3] 20.0-25.0 sec 5.96 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec [ 3] 25.0-30.0 sec 5.96 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 35.8 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec [ 3] Sent 25512 datagrams [ 3] Server Report: [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 35.8 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.011 ms 0/25511 (0%) [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 1 datagrams received out-of-order - Jarno