[DRBD-user] ASSERT FAILED: drbd_al_read_log

Walter Haidinger walter.haidinger at gmx.at
Mon Feb 7 13:56:25 CET 2011

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


Hi!

I just noticed the following after upgrading a simple cluster
to drbd-8.3.10 in the kernel logs.

drbd: GIT-hash: 5c0b0469666682443d4785d90a2c603378f9017b build by @build.k9, 2011-02-07 12:14:11
drbd: registered as block device major 147
drbd: minor_table @ 0xffff880207843680
block drbd0: Starting worker thread (from cqueue [5544])
block drbd0: disk( Diskless -> Attaching ) 
block drbd0: ASSERT( from_tnr - cnr + i - from == mx+1 ) in /kernel/drbd/drbd-8.3.10/drbd/drbd_actlog.c:514
block drbd0: ASSERT FAILED: drbd_al_read_log: (rv == 0) in /kernel/drbd/drbd-8.3.10/drbd/drbd_actlog.c:540
... [ASSERT FAILED repeated 39 times in total]
block drbd0: Found 18 transactions (1031 active extents) in activity log.
block drbd0: Method to ensure write ordering: drain
block drbd0: max BIO size = 130560
block drbd0: drbd_bm_resize called with capacity == 1555043584
block drbd0: resync bitmap: bits=194380448 words=3037195 pages=5933
block drbd0: size = 742 GB (777521792 KB)
block drbd0: bitmap READ of 5933 pages took 20 jiffies
block drbd0: recounting of set bits took additional 1 jiffies
block drbd0: 0 KB (0 bits) marked out-of-sync by on disk bit-map.
block drbd0: disk( Attaching -> UpToDate ) 
...

The machine was just upgraded to 2.6.35.11 too, is currently the inactive node.
The active node still runs drbd 8.3.9.

version: 8.3.10 (api:88/proto:86-96)
GIT-hash: 5c0b0469666682443d4785d90a2c603378f9017b build by @build.k9, 2011-02-07 12:14:11
 0: cs:Connected ro:Secondary/Primary ds:UpToDate/UpToDate C r-----
    ns:0 nr:2051256 dw:2051076 dr:0 al:0 bm:169 lo:45 pe:0 ua:46 ap:0 ep:1 wo:d oos:0
        resync: used:0/61 hits:4959 misses:286 starving:0 dirty:0 changed:286
        act_log: used:0/3389 hits:0 misses:0 starving:0 dirty:0 changed:0

Operation is fine, though. I do not notice any other problems apart from the
disturbing asserts logged above.

Still, something to worry about?

Regards, Walter



More information about the drbd-user mailing list