[DRBD-user] Corosync and DRBD fencing: one or both?
seligman at nevis.columbia.edu
Mon Aug 29 21:36:17 CEST 2011
A general question: I have a Corosync+Pacemaker with DRBD setup on Linux; I'll
give the details if it's relevant. Corosync+Pacemaker controls DRBD start, stop,
and promotion. I've implemented fencing via STONITH as Corosync resources.
I have not put fencing in the drbd.conf file; I was under the impression that
Corosync+Pacemaker would take of STONITHing a node if there's a DRBD problem. Is
this correct? Or should I have fencing/STONITH configured in both Corosync and
Does the answer change between a primary/secondary versus dual-primary setup?
Bill Seligman | Phone: (914) 591-2823
Nevis Labs, Columbia Univ | mailto://firstname.lastname@example.org
PO Box 137 |
Irvington NY 10533 USA | http://www.nevis.columbia.edu/~seligman/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4497 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the drbd-user