[DRBD-user] Setup Primary system now, Secondary Later
David Coulson
david at davidcoulson.net
Thu Aug 18 14:01:36 CEST 2011
On 8/18/11 7:15 AM, Gerald Brandt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to setup a DRBD system, with the primary being setup now (with heartbeat/pacemaker), and setting up the secondary a few months from now?
I have a system running like this - You will need to invest some time
(and downtime) to implement the second node in order to have time to
test STONITH and other two-node features you can't do much with when
you've only got one box.
>
> I understand there may be a lengthly sync period, but what are the other drawbacks/issues I'll run into?
Assuming you have protected disk under DRBD and reliability is not an
issue, running stand-alone DRBD is not a big deal - You might want to
tweak the configs so when it comes up it does not wait forever for the
second node (at least with the RedHat/Centos RPMs I've used, the default
timeout is 0).
The sync time is not a big deal - Both nodes can access the data while
it is syncing, and you can rate limit it so it'll not impact your
production IO very much.
David
More information about the drbd-user
mailing list