[DRBD-user] invalidate-remote does not work in StandAlone mode
mark-va3m46w7 at mstier.de
Fri Aug 5 13:22:42 CEST 2011
> You can disable the AL? News to me, but sounds good in your scenario.
Look at the ChangeLog for 8.3.9. invalidate-remote implicitly disables it.
> If this works, why don't you go AL-less? Seeing as you don't want to use
> a peer, there is nothing DRBD could do with its hot extents if it tried.
see the error message in my first email: invalidate-remote only works with
a connected peer or at least an inconsistent remote disk state.
The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119
More information about the drbd-user