lars.ellenberg at linbit.com
Wed Oct 20 15:59:33 CEST 2010
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:42:37PM +0200, rf at q-leap.de wrote:
> >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg at linbit.com> writes:
> Lars> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:47:14PM +0200, rf at q-leap.de wrote:
> >> Also there were two issues when compiling the kernel modules for a 2.6.32
> >> kernel (both are present in 188.8.131.52 as well). I've appended a diff to
> >> the patch file I generated using make kernel-patch.
> Lars> Works for me, though.
> Could you let me know what your exact cmdline to generate the patch is?
> Lars> The second chunk should be generated by the build automagic
> Lars> anyways.
> Build automagic of who? The kernel? When I apply the patch generated by
> make kernel-patch and compile I get a "BLK_MAX_SEGMENTS undefined" error.
Ah. Well, the build magic of DRBD.
You are supposed to build the out-of-tree DRBD module as external module.
You are not supposed to use the "make kernel-patch" thing.
It may or may not work. I don't really care if it does.
We should probably drop if from our makefiles now.
But if you go that route, you first need to
Or even KDIR=$KDIR O=$O ../scripts/adjust_drbd_config_h.sh
> Lars> Could you reason why the first chunk would be necessary?
> The kernel doesn't know about the variable $(DRBDSRC)
Of course it does not. And you should not patch it in there.
The in-kernel tree drbd must only use the in kernel tree .h files, obviously.
So the in-kernel tree Makefile should be left untouched.
: Lars Ellenberg
: LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
: DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com
DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
please don't Cc me, but send to list -- I'm subscribed
More information about the drbd-user