[DRBD-user] 3-node active/active/active config?

Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com
Wed Nov 18 09:12:04 CET 2009

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Jiann-Ming Su <sujiannming at gmail.com>wrote:

> Can you give a brief explanation of why that is the case?
> Is the problem the dual path?  What if a single path was used in some
> stacked configuration where a drbd is used as a backing device for
> another drbd share?
> --
> Jiann-Ming Su
It is wrong from a conceptual point of view, because as Lars already
explained, when you write on md0 of A, you are only writing on half md0 of B
(left side) and half md0 of C (right side).
So the other two md0 devices are not in sync with the original md0....
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20091118/a9658820/attachment.htm>

More information about the drbd-user mailing list