Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Hi Florian, why improves bonding of the replication-connection not the performance. We currently have a direct connection for the 1 Gb DRBD replication and I wanted to activate an active-active bonding (with a further LAN-port). I would expect nearly double of replication-performance. Andreas Kurz had spoken at a workshop for that. Or depends it on whether the connection between the nodes directly or via 1-n switches. regards "Florian Haas" <florian.haas-63ez5xqkn6DQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:<4B20ACF4.5090707 at linbit.com>... On 2009-12-10 00:01, Jakov Sosic wrote: > Network is not the problem because I have 4 intel giga NIC's in bonding > mode 0 (round-robin), and I can see that nasnodes are utilizing all the > interfaces, but load on them is around 1-5% You have round robin over 4 links that you replicate DRBD over? TCP reordering is definitely going to kill you. This is expected to have lower throughput that a single non-bonded link. Remove that bonding configuration. Then re-run your tests. If you want higher throughput than about 170MB/s over the wire in any single TCP connection, get 10G Ethernet. Or Infiniband. Or Dolphin Express. Bonding isn't going to help you. Cheers, Florian