Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
* Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg at linbit.com> [2008-02-27 17:52]: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 05:00:48PM +0100, Brice Figureau wrote: > > I now have a better understanding of the issue I posted in drbd-user > > yesterday, which seems to be a bug in dopd/drbd-peer-updater, hence I'm > > posted this mail in the dev list. > > > > Note that dopd works fine in the other failover scenario (the other node > > is still alive and can be contacted by other means). > > thanks, our Rasto (who wrote the dopd and related things) is reviewing > this (and was working on it, anyways). so expect it to be commited to > heartbeat development this way or an other soonish. > [...] > thanks for that, they may have been pretty annoyed for us > committing semi-broken software to their project (again). :-> Hmm. I think I stumbled over exactly this problem when I was experimenting with the drbd OCF RA and did some failover tests. This is a really nasty bug and renders the cluster kinda useless, because the failover node won't run the resources (that depend on drbd) when the active node dies. Is this assumption correct? If yes, I should stop using that broken dopd ASAP... :> -- Regards, Wolfram Schlich <wschlich at gentoo.org> Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/