Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Am Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:45:51 +0100 schrieb Florian Haas <florian.haas at linbit.com>: > You realize you're breaking an established convention by naming a > device /dev/drbd0 on one node and /dev/drbd1 on the other, and doing > the opposite for a different device? I didn't know that there is such a convention - and I liked it more to have the (usually) Primary drbd part on the same drive as the rest of the operating system. Both nodes usually do different things. > > Now my question: Is this difference significant if drbd did not > > raise any errors? I am feeling a bit uncomfortable here. What > > should I do to make the same sizes in case there is a problem with > > my setup? > > What DRBD version are you on? The version CentOS is delivering: drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos kmod-drbd-8.0.13-2 I'll shrink the filesystem on /dev/sda3 so it can fit on /dev/sdb1. Thanks for all your comments. Martin