[DRBD-user] It goes on with error got NegRSDreply for the second device
al.cecconi at gmail.com
Mon Jun 11 14:30:50 CEST 2007
Hi Lars,I just wanted to tell you (I know I'm late) that it worked out
ok using another hard disk as drbd device.
Now the systems work properly and i reached the goal of High
Avaliability (even with Gentoo!) for Postgresql and Apache.
Thank you again for the suggestion.
2007/5/18, Alberto Cecconi <al.cecconi at gmail.com>:
> 2007/5/18, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg at linbit.com>:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:54:50PM +0200, Alberto Cecconi wrote:
> > > Hi,I'm new to the list and I'm using DRBD v 0.7.23 on Linux Gentoo (1
> > excuse me when I wonder, based on personal prejudice,
> > why would someone use Gentoo (effectively a very moving target) for a
> > High Available Deployment (where you want to be as stable as possible).
> > > then the second starts sincronization and after a few i receive on the
> > > second cluster the error
> > > "drbd1 : got negRSDreply. WE ARE LOST ...
> > in drbd 0.7, there are still some "WE ARE LOST ... panic()".
> > in drbd 8, we try to do best effort, but if there is no more good data,
> > we just return io errors to the upper layers.
> > nonetheless, this is broken hardware. so, I suggest you look out for
> > hardware io errors on your disks.
> > there is not much drbd can do about them.
> > so you try to setup an "HA-Cluster"
> > with an unstable OS
> > and broken hardware.
> > not a particular good idea :)
> > at least use some sort of RAID,
> > md raid1, hw raid...
> > and monitor your disks (smart, ...).
> > --
> > : Lars Ellenberg Tel +43-1-8178292-0 :
> > : LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH Fax +43-1-8178292-82 :
> > : Vivenotgasse 48, A-1120 Vienna/Europe http://www.linbit.com :
> > __
> > please use the "List-Reply" function of your email client.
> > _______________________________________________
> > drbd-user mailing list
> > drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
> > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
> Well, I have to admit that Gentoo is not the best for this and for
> other reason (there aren't also software uitilities like drbdlinks in
> the portage),but it's not my personal choice...however it was as i
> supposed for some hardware (both computers are not so young!one is a
> pentium3 and the other a pentium4)..
> I didn't want to believe that it was a hardware fault because the
> other device drbd works perfectly and it's on the same disk,where
> before there was root partition of the OS and it never gave me
> problems. And of course I HOPED it wasn't a hardware problem :)
> I thank you for now,I'll let you know if i solved the problem changing
> the hardware..
More information about the drbd-user