[DRBD-user] Using 2 Interfaces for the same drbd device ?

[Laurent CARON]

Maurice Volaski wrote:
>> Maurice Volaski wrote:
>>>  No, this would not work. Bonding is not routing. There was once a
>>>  discussion here on how this could be accomplished a long while ago
>>> using
>>>  OSPF. It is rather complex. I seem to recall, however, that DRBD+, the
>>>  commercial version, can do this natively. Correct?
>>
>> Did you read my previous post ?
>>
> 
> Did you read mine? I said:
> 
> "This wouldn't work if the NICs are on different networks, which is what
> you'd want to also establish redundancy against switch failure.
> Heartbeat, however, has had this ability for a long time, although
> that's a way simpler connection."


Here is the question of the first post:

I just want to build a redondancy between the 2 nics for the same drbd
volume . If the link on the NIC A failed, i would like to use the NIC B
in order to keep the synchronisation on the drbd volume.

NIC redundancy, nothing else