Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Ralf Gross schrieb:
> The servers are connected by a EtherChannel and linux bonding.
>
> I had to change some parts (address), but basically it's the same
> config as before.
>
> But now the two nodes can't connect anymore. I'm a bit lost because
> the network connection is fine, I can ping both hosts. The only thing
> that has changed since by test is the EtherChannel/Bonding between the
> two server.
I now completely disabled bonding and the etherchannel. Still the same
problem.
VU0EM003
drbd1: drbd1_receiver [9140]: cstate WFConnection --> WFReportParams
drbd1: Handshake successful: DRBD Network Protocol version 74
drbd1: drbd1_receiver [9140]: cstate WFReportParams --> StandAlone
drbd1: worker terminated
drbd1: asender terminated
drbd1: drbd1_receiver [9140]: cstate StandAlone --> StandAlone
drbd1: Connection lost.
drbd1: receiver terminated
VU0EM005
drbd1: drbd1_receiver [1425]: cstate WFConnection --> WFReportParams
drbd1: Handshake successful: DRBD Network Protocol version 74
drbd1: Connection established.
drbd1: I am(S): 1:00000003:00000001:00000005:00000001:00
drbd1: Peer(S): 1:00000002:00000001:00000004:00000001:00
drbd1: drbd1_receiver [1425]: cstate WFReportParams --> WFBitMapS
drbd1: drbd1_asender [1444]: cstate WFBitMapS --> NetworkFailure
drbd1: asender terminated
drbd1: Secondary/Unknown --> Secondary/Secondary
drbd1: sock was shut down by peer
drbd1: drbd1_receiver [1425]: cstate NetworkFailure --> BrokenPipe
drbd1: worker terminated
drbd1: drbd1_receiver [1425]: cstate BrokenPipe --> Unconnected
drbd1: Connection lost.
drbd1: drbd1_receiver [1425]: cstate Unconnected --> WFConnection
VU0EM003
version: 0.7.20 (api:79/proto:74)
SVN Revision: 2260 build by root at VU0EM003, 2006-11-15 13:19:00
0: cs:WFConnection st:Secondary/Unknown ld:Consistent
ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:0 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0
1: cs:WFConnection st:Secondary/Unknown ld:Consistent
ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:0 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0
2: cs:WFConnection st:Secondary/Unknown ld:Consistent
ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:0 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0
VU0EM005
version: 0.7.20 (api:79/proto:74)
SVN Revision: 2260 build by root at VU0EM005, 2006-12-20 11:19:31
0: cs:StandAlone st:Secondary/Unknown ld:Consistent
ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:0 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0
1: cs:StandAlone st:Secondary/Unknown ld:Consistent
ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:0 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0
2: cs:StandAlone st:Secondary/Unknown ld:Consistent
ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:0 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0
I can't find any network related problem. netperf and netio both
shows full GbE performance between the 2 hosts. What more can I look
for?
Ralf