[DRBD-user] Sensible maximum number of drbd devices

mike mike503 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 6 01:53:34 CEST 2006

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


On 4/5/06, Michael Paesold <mpaesold at gmx.at> wrote:
> Unfortunately, iSCSI introduces even another overhead -- SCSI is not really
> a light-weight protocol. Another option would be gnbd, but that requires a
> dedicated "SAN" server cluster, again.

Isn't that what ToE cards are designed for? :)



More information about the drbd-user mailing list