Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 18:05, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > / 2004-10-05 17:59:08 +0200 > > \ Bernd Schubert: > > On Tuesday 05 October 2004 17:13, Benoit.Ropartz at alcatel.fr wrote: > > > Ok i have tested writes speed during normal operation and i got sames > > > results > > > with two versions ~ 600 Ko/s. > > > > > > But why i find difference when syncing is active (30ko=>2ko) ??? > > > > Just read the changelog of 0.7.5, the write speed barrier of 30MB/s has > > gone with this version. Probably you are now syncing with the full speed > > of your hardware (check the logs or /proc/drbd during the synchronisation > > to get the sync speed) and with the previous version only at 30MB/s and > > so there was l more capacity left for normal writing operation. > > right. > thanks for answering those questions. Welcome, actually I don't see a reason why usually only you, Philipp and a very few other members of this list answer those questions. Well, most times you are so fast, that you already answered before I read the mail ;) > > > > And 2ko/s is very small.... > > > > Btw, what does the unit 'ko' mean? kilo operations? > > the french guys did not yet notice that the iso name is byte. > the ones I know even keep confusing byte with bit because if > a frenchman pronounces it, it sounds the same, anyways. I see. > > so they keep saying octet, which is a correct term, too, of course. > only not much used outside france... ROTFL Cheers, Bernd