[DRBD-user] Re: Negative values of wfc-timeout
cyril at bouthors.org
Thu Nov 25 08:31:06 CET 2004
You are right., I understand my mistake now, DRBD is definitely the
best place where the decisions about sync/replication have to be made.
As you said, this is independent of the primary/secondary state.
It was not clear to me because the man page of 0.7.5 explicitly says:
"positive [wfc-timeout] will (try to) force primary status".
It's a mistake and has been fixed in svn.
Sorry about that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the drbd-user