Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Monday 24 May 2004 16:19, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote: > Philipp Reisner schrieb: > > Look for "load-only" "skip-wait" and negative init timeouts. > > ACK. This is suitable, if availabilty has more priority than data. > > Sorry for insisting, but let's think about an example of 3 pairs of > services/drbd-resources: > > - service1/drbd1 is configured for human intervention and human > intervention is actually necessary. > - service2/drbd2 is configured for human intervention and human > intervention is actually not necessary. > - service3/drbd3 can be Primary anyways, because "outdated" is > acceptable. > > As far as I understand the init-script, it will wait at drbd1 for human > input, and drbd2, drbd3 get no chance. Independent, if and what failover > software is used. > > I think, other drbd-resources should work independent from the problems > of only _one_ drbd-resource. > > Helmut Wollmersdorfer > So, what do you suggest ? -- Unfortunately heartbeat does not take hints from DRBD. The only way to make sure that heartbeat does not activate a resource is to not start it at all. We are aware of the problem and working on it. But do not expect that we will change anything in DRBD-0.6.x . Development happens at DRBD-0.7. Although it is not formal, I would say we are already in a kind of feature freeze for 0.7. -Philipp -- : Dipl-Ing Philipp Reisner Tel +43-1-8178292-50 : : LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH Fax +43-1-8178292-82 : : Schönbrunnerstr 244, 1120 Vienna, Austria http://www.linbit.com :