[DRBD-user] using drbd in a monolithic kernel?

[Lars Ellenberg]

> It looks like a few other changes didn't quite make it in, though.  I've
> attached the two missed pieces.

> diff -x CVS -uNrp drbd/drbd/drbd_int.h drbd-0.7_pre2/drbd/drbd_int.h
> --- drbd/drbd/drbd_int.h	2004-03-24 10:41:14.000000000 -0800
> +++ drbd-0.7_pre2/drbd/drbd_int.h	2004-03-17 15:34:34.000000000 -0800
> @@ -192,10 +192,12 @@ extern void drbd_assert_breakpoint(drbd_
>  # define UNLOCK_SIGMASK(task,flags) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->sighand->siglock, flags)
>  # define RECALC_SIGPENDING(TSK)     (recalc_sigpending_tsk(TSK))
>  
> +# ifndef MODULE
>  // defined in drbd_main.c,
>  // copied from redhat's kernel-2.4.20-13.9 kernel/signal.c
>  // to avoid a recompile of the redhat kernel
>  inline void recalc_sigpending_tsk(struct task_struct *t);
> +# endif

This first was in and then was backed out again.
I think Philipp had a reason to back it out?

> diff -x CVS -uNrp drbd/drbd.spec drbd-0.7_pre2/drbd.spec
> --- drbd/drbd.spec	2003-10-21 01:58:42.000000000 -0700
> +++ drbd-0.7_pre2/drbd.spec	2004-03-17 12:15:12.000000000 -0800
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Vendor: DRBD 
>  License: GPL
>  ExclusiveOS: linux
>  Group: System Environment/Kernel
> -Packager: 
> +Packager: Lars Ellenberg <l.g.e at web.de>

No Sir. :)
I'm NOT the packager for "just someone" that happens to say "make rpm".
Not at all.  So I don't like my name in a spec file *template*.

BTW, the spec file template should be updated, the 0.6.X version has
been improved, so this should be forward-ported to 0.7...

	Lars Ellenberg