Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
/ 2004-06-15 12:16:31 -0700 \ Ernest Byaruhanga: > Hello DRBD users, > > I am trying to Install DRBD 0.6.12 on RedHat Enterprise AS 3.0 > (kernel2.4.21-4.ELsmp) I get the following errors while doing a > "make clean all" > > <snip> > > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:972: invalid suffix on integer > constant > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:972: syntax error before numeric > constant > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:972: warning: function > declaration isn't a prototype > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:972: field `unlockfs_R_ver_str' > declared as a function > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:1132: invalid suffix on integer > constant > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:1132: syntax error before > numeric constant > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:1132: `sys_close_R_ver_str' > declared as function returning a function > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:1132: warning: function > declaration isn't a prototype > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:1138: invalid suffix on integer > constant > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:1138: syntax error before > numeric constant > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:1138: `getname_R_ver_str' > declared as function returning a function > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:1138: warning: function > declaration isn't a prototype > /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL/include/linux/fs.h:1148: > `unregister_blkdev_R_ver_str' declared as function returning a function > > <snip> > > make: *** [drbd_fs.o] Error 1 > make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/drbd-0.6.12/drbd' > make: *** [_mod_/usr/src/drbd-0.6.12/drbd] Error 2 > make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-4.EL' > make: *** [kbuild] Error 2 > > what am i doing wrong? At first i got the error about loadabe modules not > being enabled in th ekernel, but i checked and they are enabled. I then > instead enabled the "Network Block Device" in th ekernel. you are sure that you _did_ read INSTALL ?? this is a (educated) guess only. include/linux/fs.h is a standard kernel header. it is very unlikely that such a file is corrupt... you won't have a working kernel :) maybe for some reason RH thinks it is cool to have the standard compiler different from the one you need to use for kernel compiles. use the right compiler. lge