Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
--On Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:59 AM +0200 Lars Ellenberg <Lars.Ellenberg at linbit.com> wrote: >> >> First, I see that CVS has gone back to the -pre8 version number. I'm >> sure I have the latest CVS since I had files with changes dated today, >> including that bitmap stuff and changes to bash and perl scripts. >> That's not a big deal, I guess. > > somehow I got the impression that the -pre9 tag never reached cvs ?? > anyways, updated to -pre10... > Yes, that's probably true. It confused me because what I checked out of CVS was labeled -pre8 but was really newer than the -pre9 I had downloaded from the website. And they both had the exact same July 5 date and time in the build timestamp. > > while fixing some 32<->64 bit issues, we had to allign all our > packets to 64bit, to make them on-the-wire compatible. > the first ever exchanged packet (parameter exchange handshake) > changed its size, and the code in there could not cope with that. > > we definetely need to introduce a new > "fixed-size-for-the-next-100-years" handshake packet. > yes, please :-) > fix in the works... > anyways, yes, you need to update both peers to current cvs. > OK, so if I shut down drbd on both nodes, update them both, reboot them both, you'd expect it to all come up fine? Thanks Jeff -- Jeff Tucker jeff at jltnet.com