[DRBD-user] Re: New drbd .spec file for 0.6.10+
jafo at tummy.com
Sun Feb 29 08:10:59 CET 2004
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 10:12:33AM +0100, Philipp Reisner wrote:
>Could you please confirm that, current CVS head has the .spec file
>as it shoulde be ?
It looks like the version in CVS doesn't allow installing both the SMP
and non-SMP version. It also uses "km" instead of "kernel-module" for
the prefix, and doesn't include the "drbd" name in the package name.
Interesting choices for the name. I don't think I've ever seen that
convention used before. I'd probably recommend at least putting "drbd"
in the package name -- it's not like drbd is the only third-party module
"You can tune a file-system, but you can't tune a fish."
-- Quote from tunefs(1M) man page
Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff <jafo at tummy.com>
tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, Python, SysAdmin
More information about the drbd-user